Dear Brookline Booksmith,
Thanks so much for inviting me to visit your wonderful independent bookstore to read and do a Q&A with fellow mystery novelist Peter Swanson. During the 1990s every time I published a Matt Jacob Novel, you invited me to speak. On top of which, after twenty years and my latest book about Matt Jacob (Ties That Blind), you invited me back again. I appreciate your generosity and love your store. I had intended to put up pictures and comments until I realized this column belonged to Patriots’ Day and not my personal accomplishments. (For those of you who might want to see a couple pictures, please visit my Facebook Authors page and, if so inclined, “like” the page.)
Patriots’ Day is a Massachusetts and Maine holiday commemorating the Revolutionary War battles of Lexington and Concord. Historically it had been celebrated on April 19th, but in 1969 it was changed to the third Monday of every April. This year both days coincide. (Perhaps an omen given the upcoming sentencing trial of the Boston Marathon bomber.)
I used to really enjoy the holiday. For a ton of years my friend Ed and I would go to Fenway Park and watch the Red Sox, who traditionally began their game at 11 AM. We’d hang there until around the 7th inning, (those days the cost for tickets made leaving early reasonable) then walk to our favorite vantage point to cheer on the Boston Marathon runners as they passed by.
I don’t know why, or even when, we stopped our annual pilgrimage. Long enough ago that I’d even stopped watching the winners cross the finish line on TV.
Patriots’ Day 2013 burst my complacency when two bombs exploded close to the Marathon’s finish line, killing at least three, and injuring or maiming hundreds more. Soon after, the Boston Police and Federal Agents linked the horror to the shooting of an M.I.T. security guard and the theft of an S.U.V., which was eventually spotted in Watertown, a city nearby Boston.
Police from Boston and neighboring towns, along with Federal Agents, converged upon the town and shot one of the suspects who was then killed when his brother (the other suspect) inadvertently ran him over in his attempt to escape. Eventually, this second suspect was seen in a boat placed in a yard behind a Watertown resident who informed the authorities.
A massive gunfight ensued in which the authorities fired over three hundred rounds, despite which the suspect lived, brought to a Federal trial, and recently (April 8th) the suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, was found guilty of 30 counts, including 17 that carry the death penalty.
In a previous column I wrote and condemned the abrogation of civil liberties imposed upon Boston and its surrounding towns during the entire manhunt. No need to rehash the matter, other than to say that my post found very few people who agreed with my positions.
I expect the same today as I advocate against the death penalty for Tsarnaev.
During the trial, prosecutors relentlessly used the death of eight-year-old Martin Richard (the youngest of those who died) to impress upon the jury the heinous and depraved nature of Tsarnaev’s actions—including submitting Martin’s burnt clothes into evidence. But this 17th of April, Martin’s parents wrote a public letter requesting that the Feds take the death penalty off the table in exchange for life imprisonment without parole and the relinquishment of all the defendant’s appeals. While I laud the humanity of that letter and fully appreciate their desire for “closure,” my reasons are quite different.
I believe the death penalty is nothing less than state sanctioned murder. And, in this particular situation, the “state” isn’t Massachusetts (a NO DEATH PENALTY STATE by law) but the federal government that overrode state law and tried Tsarnaev under federal laws which allow the possibility of execution.
Let me be absolutely clear. What the Tsarnaev brothers did was totally, reprehensible, unconscionable, and, to me, virtually incomprehensible. I was, and continue to be, repulsed by their actions, which make me stomach sick.
But so do hangings, electrocutions, firing squads, and lethal injections—no matter who does the deed, be it an individual, group, gang, or government.
I am in no way, shape, or form a religious person. But I do adhere to Thou Shalt Not Kill and no amount of lawyering or any circumstance other than defense of self, family, or another person (which even the “god” who said the above permits) can convince me that the words Thou Shalt Not Kill are anything other than what they mean. Killing an innocent or a guilty is flat out murder—whatever suit you dress it in.
For those who legitimately question the cost of housing and feeding murderers, in a recent conversation with a judge I was informed that studies have indicated the taxpayer’s share of the costs of appeals and “stays” of state sanctioned murder are even greater. (To say nothing about our burgeoning “for profit” prisons.)
And I haven’t even delved into the issue of whether a judge or jury gets it wrong—as Project Innocence has shown time and time again.
On this Patriots’ Day I think it important to really ask what kind of country we want to be patriots of.
I second your opposition to death penalty. An additional but not necessary reason is that I think it would be much easier to be dead than endure a lifetime in prison with no hope of leaving
Ron–Yeah, I think a lifetime in prison would be a tough do. Though opposition to the death penalty seems like a hard sell these days, it was encouraging to read this morning about two more maimed victims of the Marathon bombing request that the death penalty be taken off the table.
Please, no dealth penalty. It doesn’t solve a thing.
Perhaps I’ll comment with another sentence later.
Trudy–Couldn’t agree more.
I’m fine with the death penalty, but not so much with the federal government taking things over, so end the end I’d be opposed to it here.
Don–of course I wish you weren’t for the death penalty but am glad you’re at least against it in this situation.
Agree Cuz. Beyond the principal that I hold dear, we should not invite the circus that a sentence of death will cause
Frank–True. And more maimed victims have asked that the death penalty be taken off the table since I wrote the column. Let’s hope.
It is Thursday, Zach. I read your article yesterday, haunted by it, I have been struggling with what comment I could leave here.
It’s a good write, and I am more inclined to agree with you in every way, than not. So, what bites into me? I don’t know. I think it’s that this whole subject is so powerful and painful and full of every kind of remorse and regret possible, that I cannot begin to step up to my feelings. The thought of every victim involved overwhelms my senses. And I do mean every one of every one that exists within the widest scope of every crime ever committed. Nothing is simple and straight forward for me. I cave in emotionally easily. In the face of this subject I stand back utterly at loss for what to think or feel. I’m overwhelmed.
You wrote it well.
Kathleen–There’s no law that says you have to have a position on *everything.* That you feel and care so deeply about this issue speaks to your humanity far better than any ideological political stand on what’s a complex and many-sided issue.
Thank you, Zach.
Kathleen–None needed.
Good post. 100% in agreement. Something very uncivilized about capital punishment. If someone I love were murdered, I think I might be capable of trying to kill the person responsible in the immediate aftermath. But that’s a different thing than supporting government-sanctioned murder. There is no deterrent value to the death penalty, it’s only value is to satisfy vengeance. We should be better than that.
Paddy–“There is no deterrent value to the death penalty, it’s only value is to satisfy vengeance. We should be better than that.” Can’t say it any better than this. Thanks for reading the column and commenting.