(Artistic License Taken)
Thursday night I’d anticipated going to the documentary Phil Ochs: There But for Fortune. This edited instant message conversation took place between me and my blogger friend Rawrah (http://rawrahs.blogspot.com/ or see “Links” on this site):
Rawrah: From what I’ve read he hated Dylan. Ochs would torture himself to write and Dylan would simply pull magic out of his ass.
Me: For sure Ochs poked fun at Dylan. In one of his songs (forgot the name) he did it in a self-deprecating way. But I would call Dylan’s lyrics poetry, not magic.
Rawrah: Ochs believed in what he was singing. Dylan rejects the idea of “meaning” in his songs.
ME: Hell, I’ve used that line about my Matt Jacob books. Don’t make it true.
Rawrah: You might bullshit but that doesn’t make Dylan a liar.
ME: Trudat—but I still think he’s doing a throwaway.
Rawrah: Good to be a mind reader, huh?
ME: Asshole. It’s interesting. Dylan is talked about at the music studio. Probably ’cause I bring him up.
Rawrah: About whether he actually knew what he was saying in his songs?
ME: No. Because I say he’s the most important songwriter in our lifetime. The argument is usually about his “musicality.” I’m hit with “He can’t sing and his music is at best rudimentary, if that.” I say the poetry of his lyrics supersedes—but that don’t really fly at a music school.
Rawrah: I think people attribute a lot more depth than is actually displayed.
ME: Thanks, pal.
Rawrah: I read he’d skim a newspaper and dump out three or four songs of lyrics. Or eavesdrop on a conversation then spew out its essence. A savant.
Me: Depends on the definition. Savant means “sage” or, as in “idiot savant–an intellectually disabled person who exhibits extraordinary ability in a highly specialized area, like mathematics or music. Gotta be a stretch to call Dylan intellectually disabled.
Rawrah: Why? Some say most people have “savant” potential but few have the series of experiences to trigger it.
ME: You know, we’re writing my Monday post. You mind?
Rawrah: Feel free.
ME: Thanks. See, what I think when you talk about Ochs’ needing to struggle to write and Dylan “pulling it out of his ass,” is their difference in ability to access the subconscious. Take Robin Williams…
Rawrah: Uh oh.
ME: When he’s on a talk show and somebody says something that clicks you can almost see the door to his subconscious open and out comes a riot. But a crafted riot. So I’m saying that Dylan’s door was more open than Ochs but that Ochs got there anyway and both used craft to hone their message into art.
Rawrah: And isn’t that the real difference between Ochs and Dylan. Ochs had to work to create—to say nothing about living his ideals—and Dylan didn’t.
ME: I probably call that the difference between genius and not. As for living ideals, don’t forget Dylan helped ignite a movement and Ochs ending up killing himself
Rawrah: Now who’s the asshole? I’d say there are truly gifted people and when their particular gift intersects at precisely the right circumstance, what emerges is magic.
“Please… could somebody just go ahead and WikiLeak whatever it is Bob Dylan has been singing for 50 years?” Bauart